{"id":1504,"date":"2021-07-24T12:46:08","date_gmt":"2021-07-24T07:16:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/?p=1504"},"modified":"2025-03-17T10:04:29","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T04:34:29","slug":"brain-circuit-for-spirituality-identified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/brain-circuit-for-spirituality-identified\/","title":{"rendered":"Brain Circuit for Spirituality Identified"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"entry-title title flipboard-title\">Brain Circuit for Spirituality Identified<\/h2>\n<p><strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/spirituality-brain-neurotheology-18845\/\">Summary<\/a>:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><em>A new study has identified a specific brain circuit centered in the periaqueductal gray linked to spiritual acceptance and religiosity.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Source:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><em>Brigham and Women\u2019s Hospital<\/em><\/p>\n<p>More than 80 percent of people around the world consider themselves to be religious or spiritual. However, research on the neuroscience of spirituality and religiosity has been sparse. Previous studies have used functional neuroimaging, in which an individual undergoes a brain scan while performing a task to see what areas of the brain light up. However, these correlative studies have given a spotty and often inconsistent picture of spirituality.<\/p>\n<p>A new study led by investigators at\u00a0Brigham and Women\u2019s Hospital\u00a0takes a new approach to mapping spirituality and religiosity and finds that spiritual acceptance can be localized to a specific brain circuit.<\/p>\n<p>This brain circuit is centered in the periaqueductal gray (PAG), a brainstem region implicated in numerous functions, including fear conditioning, pain modulation, altruistic behaviors, and unconditional love.<\/p>\n<p>The team\u2019s findings are published in\u00a0<em>Biological Psychiatry<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p data-slot-rendered-dynamic=\"true\">\u201cOur results suggest that spirituality and religiosity are rooted in fundamental, neurobiological dynamics and deeply woven into our neuro-fabric,\u201d said corresponding author Michael Ferguson, Ph.D., a principal investigator in Brigham\u2019s Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics. \u201cWe were astonished to find that this brain circuit for spirituality is centered in one of the most evolutionarily preserved structures in the brain.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>To conduct their study, Ferguson and colleagues used a technique called lesion network mapping that allows investigators to map complex human behaviors to specific brain circuits based on the locations of brain lesions in patients.<\/p>\n<p>The team leveraged a previously published dataset that included 88 neurosurgical patients undergoing surgery to remove a brain tumor. Lesion locations were distributed throughout the brain. Patients completed a survey that included questions about spiritual acceptance before and after surgery.<\/p>\n<p>The team validated their results using the second dataset of more than 100 patients with lesions caused by penetrating head trauma from combat during the Vietnam War. These participants also completed questionnaires that included questions about religiosity (such as, \u201cDo you consider yourself a religious person? Yes or No?\u201d).<\/p>\n<p>Of the 88 neurosurgical patients, 30 showed a decrease in self-reported spiritual belief before and after neurosurgical brain tumor resection, 29 showed an increase, and 29 showed no change. Using lesion network mapping, the team found that self-reported spirituality mapped to a specific brain circuit centered on the PAG. The circuit included positive nodes and negative nodes \u2014 lesions that disrupted these respective nodes either decreased or increased self-reported spiritual beliefs.<\/p>\n<p data-slot-rendered-dynamic=\"true\">Results on religiosity from the second dataset aligned with these findings. In addition, in a review of the literature, the researchers found several case reports of patients who became hyper-religious after experiencing brain lesions that affected the negative nodes of the circuit.<\/p>\n<div class=\"mv-ad-box\" data-slotid=\"content_2_btf\">\n<div id=\"content_2_btf_wrapper\" class=\"adunitwrapper content_btf_wrapper mv-size-300x250\" data-wrapper=\"content_2_btf\" data-nosnippet=\"\">\n<div id=\"content_2_btf\" class=\"content_btf adunit\" data-google-query-id=\"CIDs5p39-vECFaPfcwEdEQUM2Q\">\n<div id=\"google_ads_iframe_\/1030006\/neurosciencenews\/content_1__container__\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Lesion locations associated with other neurological and psychiatric symptoms also intersected with the spirituality circuit. Specifically, lesions causing parkinsonism intersected positive circuit areas, as did lesions associated with decreased spirituality. Lesions causing delusions and alien limb syndrome intersected with negative regions, associated with increased spirituality and religiosity.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s important to note that these overlaps may help understand shared features and associations, but these results should not be over-interpreted,\u201d said Ferguson.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor example, our results do not imply that religion is a delusion, that historical religious figures suffered from alien limb syndrome, or that Parkinson\u2019s disease arises due to a lack of religious faith. Instead, our results point to the deep roots of spiritual beliefs in a part of our brain that\u2019s been implicated in many important functions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The authors note that the datasets they used do not provide rich information about the patient\u2019s upbringing, influencing spiritual beliefs. Patients in both datasets were from predominantly Christian cultures. To understand the generalizability of their results, they would need to replicate their study across many backgrounds.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" data-slot-rendered-dynamic=\"true\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-75366 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public.jpg?resize=420%2C280&#038;ssl=1\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 770px) 100vw, 770px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public.jpg 770w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public-370x247.jpg 370w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public-293x195.jpg 293w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public-150x100.jpg 150w\" alt=\"This shows a woman's hand filled with sunlight\" width=\"420\" height=\"280\" \/><figcaption>Lesion locations associated with other neurological and psychiatric symptoms also intersected with the spirituality circuit. Image is in the public domain.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The team is also interested in untangling religiosity and spirituality to understand brain circuits that may be driving differences. Additionally, Ferguson would like to pursue clinical and translational applications for the findings, including understanding the role that spirituality and compassion may have in clinical treatment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOnly recently have medicine and spirituality been fractionated from one another. There seems to be this perennial union between healing and spirituality across cultures and civilizations,\u201d said Ferguson.<\/p>\n<p data-slot-rendered-dynamic=\"true\">\u201cI\u2019m interested in the degree to which our understanding of brain circuits could help craft scientifically grounded, clinically-translatable questions about how healing and spirituality can co-inform each other.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"inline-post clearfix\">\n<div class=\"see-also byline\">See also<\/div>\n<div id=\"block-wrap-59234\" class=\"block-wrap-native block-wrap block-wrap-23 block-css-59234 block-wrap-classic columns__m--1 elements-design-1 block-ani block-skin-0 tipi-box block-wrap-thumbnail ppl-m-1 clearfix loaded\" data-id=\"59234\" data-base=\"0\">\n<div class=\"tipi-row-inner-style clearfix\">\n<div class=\"tipi-row-inner-box contents sticky--wrap\">\n<div class=\"block block-23 clearfix\">\n<article class=\"tipi-xs-12 clearfix with-fi ani-base tipi-xs-typo split-1 split-design-1 loop-0 preview-thumbnail preview-23 elements-design-1 post-72765 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-featured category-neuroscience category-open-neuroscience-articles tag-aging tag-anabolic-androgenic-steroids tag-anabolic-steroids tag-brain-aging tag-brain-research tag-elsevier tag-neurobiology tag-neuroscience tag-open-access tag-open-science tag-testosterone mv-content-wrapper article-window\">\n<div class=\"preview-mini-wrap clearfix\">\n<div class=\"mask\"><a class=\"mask-img\" href=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/steriod-brain-aging-18111\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/03\/anabolic-steroids-brain-aging-neurosinces-public-100x100.jpg?resize=100%2C100&#038;ssl=1\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 100px) 100vw, 100px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/03\/anabolic-steroids-brain-aging-neurosinces-public-100x100.jpg 100w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/03\/anabolic-steroids-brain-aging-neurosinces-public-293x293.jpg 293w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/03\/anabolic-steroids-brain-aging-neurosinces-public-390x390.jpg 390w, https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/files\/2021\/03\/anabolic-steroids-brain-aging-neurosinces-public-96x96.jpg 96w\" alt=\"This shows a brain\" width=\"100\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"byline byline-2 byline-cats-design-2\">\n<div class=\"byline-part cats\"><a class=\"cat cat-with-bg\" href=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/neuroscience-topics\/featured\/\">Featured<\/a><a class=\"cat cat-with-bg\" href=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/neuroscience-topics\/neuroscience\/\">Neuroscience<\/a><a class=\"cat cat-with-bg\" href=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/neuroscience-topics\/open-neuroscience-articles\/\">Open Neuroscience Articles<\/a><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"byline-part date\"><time class=\"entry-date published dateCreated flipboard-date\" datetime=\"2021-03-25T12:58:11-07:00\">March 25, 2021<\/time><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"title-wrap\">\n<p class=\"title\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/neurosciencenews.com\/steriod-brain-aging-18111\/\">Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids Accelerate Brain Aging<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 id=\"firstHeading\" class=\"firstHeading\">Neuroscience of religion and Spirituality<\/h2>\n<p>The\u00a0<b>neuroscience of religion<\/b>, also known as\u00a0<b>neurotheology<\/b> and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neuroscience_of_religion#cite_note-Biello-1\"><b>spiritual neuroscience<\/b><\/a>, <sup id=\"cite_ref-Biello_1-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>attempts to explain religious experience and behavior in neuroscientific terms.<sup id=\"cite_ref-AaenStockdale_2-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0It is the study of correlations of\u00a0neural\u00a0phenomena with subjective experiences of\u00a0spirituality\u00a0and hypotheses to explain these phenomena. This contrasts with the\u00a0psychology of religion,\u00a0which studies mental, rather than neural, states.<\/p>\n<p>Proponents of the neuroscience of religion say there is a\u00a0neurological\u00a0and\u00a0evolutionary\u00a0basis for\u00a0subjective experiences\u00a0traditionally categorized as\u00a0spiritual or religious.<sup id=\"cite_ref-gajilan2007_3-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0The field has formed the basis of several\u00a0<a title=\"Popular science\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Popular_science\">popular science<\/a>\u00a0books.<sup id=\"cite_ref-Alper_4-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><sup id=\"cite_ref-Zen1_5-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><sup id=\"cite_ref-Zen2_6-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"Introduction\" class=\"mw-headline\">Introduction<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;Neurotheology&#8221; is a\u00a0<a title=\"Neologism\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neologism\">neologism<\/a> that describes the scientific study of the neural correlates of religious or spiritual beliefs, experiences, and practices. Other researchers prefer to use terms like &#8220;spiritual neuroscience&#8221; or &#8220;neuroscience of religion.&#8221; Researchers in the field attempt to explain the neurological basis for religious experiences, such as:<sup id=\"cite_ref-7\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The perception that\u00a0time,\u00a0fear,\u00a0or\u00a0self-consciousness\u00a0have dissolved<\/li>\n<li>Spiritual\u00a0awe<\/li>\n<li>Oneness with the universe<\/li>\n<li>Ecstatic\u00a0trance<\/li>\n<li>Sudden enlightenment<sup id=\"cite_ref-8\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/li>\n<li>Altered states of consciousness<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><span id=\"Terminology\" class=\"mw-headline\">Terminology<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Aldous Huxley\u00a0used the term\u00a0<i>neurotheology<\/i>\u00a0for the first time in the utopian novel\u00a0<i>Island<\/i>. The discipline studies the cognitive neuroscience of\u00a0religious experience\u00a0and spirituality. The term is also sometimes used in a less\u00a0scientific\u00a0context or a philosophical context. Some of these uses, according to the mainstream scientific community, qualify as\u00a0pseudoscience. Huxley used it mainly in a philosophical context.<\/p>\n<p>The use of the term neurotheology in published scientific work is already common. A search on the citation indexing service provided by\u00a0the Institute for Scientific Information\u00a0returns 68 articles (December\/2020). A search in\u00a0<a title=\"Google Scholar\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Google_Scholar\">Google Scholar<\/a>, also in December 2020, gives several pages of references, both of books and scientific articles.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"Theoretical_work\" class=\"mw-headline\">Theoretical work brain<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>In an attempt to focus and clarify what was a growing interest in this field, in 1994, educator and businessman Laurence O. McKinney published the first book on the subject, titled &#8220;Neurotheology: Virtual Religion in the 21st Century&#8221;, written for a popular audience but also promoted in the theological<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neuroscience_of_religion#cite_note-McKinney-9\"> journal\u00a0<i>Zygon<\/i><\/a>.<sup id=\"cite_ref-McKinney_9-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup> According to McKinney, neurotheology sources, the basis of religious inquiry is relatively recent developmental neurophysiology. According to McKinney&#8217;s theory, pre-frontal development in humans creates an illusion of chronological time as a fundamental part of normal adult cognition, past three. The inability of the adult brain to retrieve earlier images experienced by an infantile brain creates questions such as &#8220;where did I come from&#8221; and &#8220;where does it all go,&#8221; which McKinney suggests led to the creation of various religious explanations. The experience of death as a peaceful regression into timelessness as the brain dies won praise from readers as varied as author <a title=\"Arthur C. Clarke\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Arthur_C._Clarke\">Arthur C. Clarke<\/a>, eminent theologian\u00a0Harvey Cox, and the\u00a0Dalai Lama and sparked a new interest in the field.<\/p>\n<p>What\u00a0Andrew B. Newberg\u00a0and others &#8220;discovered is that intensely focused\u00a0spiritual contemplation triggers an alteration in the brain activity that leads one to perceive transcendent religious experiences as a solid, tangible reality. In other words, the sensation that Buddhists\u00a0call\u00a0<i>oneness with the universe<\/i>.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-10\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0The\u00a0orientation\u00a0area requires sensory input to do its calculus. &#8220;If you block sensory inputs to this region, as you do during the intense concentration of meditation, you prevent the brain from forming the distinction between\u00a0self\u00a0and not-self,&#8221; says Newberg. With no information from the senses arriving, the left orientation area cannot find any boundary between the self and the world. As a result, the brain seems to have no choice but &#8220;to perceive the self as endless and intimately interwoven with everyone and everything.&#8221; &#8220;The right orientation area, equally bereft of sensory data, defaults to a feeling of infinite space. The meditators feel that they have touched infinity.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-11\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>The radical Catholic theologian\u00a0Eugen Drewermann\u00a0developed a two-volume critique of traditional conceptions of\u00a0God\u00a0and the\u00a0soul\u00a0and a reinterpretation of religion (Modern Neurology and the Question of God) based on current neuroscientific research.<sup id=\"cite_ref-Drewermann_12-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>However, it has also been argued: &#8220;that neurotheology should be conceived and practiced within a <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neuroscience_of_religion#cite_note-13\">theological framework<\/a>.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-13\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0Furthermore, it has been suggested that creating a separate category for this kind of research is moot since conventional Behavioural and Social Neurosciences disciplines can handle any empirical <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neuroscience_of_religion#cite_note-14\">investigation of this nature<\/a>.<sup id=\"cite_ref-14\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Various theories regarding the\u00a0evolutionary origin of religion\u00a0and the\u00a0evolutionary psychology of religion\u00a0have been proposed.<\/p>\n<h2><span id=\"Experimental_work\" class=\"mw-headline\">Experimental work on Spirituality with the brain<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>In 1969, British biologist\u00a0Alister Hardy\u00a0founded a Religious Experience Research Centre at Oxford after retiring from his post as Linacre Professor of Zoology. Citing\u00a0William James&#8217;s\u00a0<i>The Varieties of Religious Experience<\/i> (1902), he collected first-hand accounts of\u00a0numinous\u00a0experiences. He was awarded the\u00a0Templeton Prize before he died in 1985. His successor David Hay suggested in <i>God\u2019s Biologist: A life of Alister Hardy<\/i> (2011) that the RERC later dispersed as investigators turned to newer scientific investigation techniques.<\/p>\n<h3><span id=\"Magnetic_stimulation_studies\" class=\"mw-headline\">Magnetic stimulation studies<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"hatnote navigation-not-searchable\" role=\"note\">Main article:\u00a0God helmet<\/div>\n<p>During the 1980s, Michael Persinger\u00a0stimulated the\u00a0temporal lobes\u00a0of human subjects with a weak\u00a0magnetic field\u00a0using an apparatus that popularly became known as the &#8220;God helmet&#8221; and reported that many of his subjects claimed to experience a &#8220;sensed presence&#8221; during stimulation.\u00a0This work has been\u00a0criticized,<sup id=\"cite_ref-AaenStockdale_2-1\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><sup id=\"cite_ref-Larsson_18-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0though some researchers<sup id=\"cite_ref-Tinoca_Oritz_19-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0have published a replication of one God Helmet experiment.<sup id=\"cite_ref-Richards_1993_20-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Granqvist <i>et al.<\/i>\u00a0claimed that Persinger&#8217;s work was not &#8220;double-blind.&#8221; Participants were often\u00a0graduate students\u00a0who knew what sort of results to expect, and there was the risk that the\u00a0experimenters&#8217; expectations\u00a0would be transmitted to subjects by unconscious cues. The participants were frequently given an idea of the purpose of the study by being asked to fill in questionnaires designed to test their suggestibility to\u00a0paranormal\u00a0experiences before the trials were conducted. Granqvist\u00a0<i>et al.<\/i>\u00a0failed to\u00a0replicate Persinger&#8217;s double-blinded experiments. They concluded that the presence or absence of the magnetic field had no relationship with any <a title=\"Religious experience\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Religious_experience\">religious or spiritual experience<\/a> reported by the participants but was predicted entirely by their suggestibility and personality traits. Following the publication of this study, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neuroscience_of_religion#cite_note-21\">Persinger\u00a0<i>et al.<\/i>\u00a0dispute this<\/a>.<sup id=\"cite_ref-21\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup> One published attempt to create a &#8220;haunted room&#8221; using environmental &#8220;complex&#8221; electromagnetic fields based on Persinger&#8217;s theoretical and experimental work did not produce the sensation of a &#8220;sensed presence&#8221; and found that reports of unusual experiences were uncorrelated with the presence or absence of these fields. As in Granqvist\u00a0<i>et al.,<\/i> reports of unusual experiences were instead predicted by participants&#8217; personality characteristics and suggestibility.<sup id=\"cite_ref-French_22-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0One experiment with a commercial version of the God helmet found no difference in response to graphic images whether the device was on or off.<sup id=\"cite_ref-GendleMcGrath_23-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><sup id=\"cite_ref-AaenStockdaleMurphy_24-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<h3><span id=\"Neuropsychology_and_neuroimaging\" class=\"mw-headline\">Neuropsychology and neuroimaging<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The first researcher to note and catalog the abnormal experiences associated with\u00a0temporal lobe epilepsy\u00a0(TLE) was neurologist\u00a0Norman Geschwind, who noted a set of religious behavioral traits associated with TLE seizures.<sup id=\"cite_ref-WaxmanGeschwind_25-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0These include\u00a0hypergraphia, hyper religiosity,\u00a0reduced sexual interest,\u00a0fainting spells, and\u00a0pedanticism, often collectively ascribed to a condition known as\u00a0Geschwind syndrome.<\/p>\n<p>Vilayanur S. Ramachandran explored the neural basis of the hyper religiosity seen in TLE using the\u00a0galvanic skin response (GSR), which correlates with emotional arousal, to determine whether the hyper religiosity seen in TLE was due to an overall heightened emotional state or was specific to religious stimuli. Ramachandran presented two subjects with neutral, sexually arousing, and religious words while measuring GSR. Ramachandran was able to show that patients with TLE showed enhanced emotional responses to the religious words, diminished responses to the sexually charged words, and normal responses to the neutral words. This study was presented as an abstract at a neuroscience conference and referenced in Ramachandran&#8217;s book, <i>Phantoms in the Brain. Still, it<\/i>\u00a0has never been published in the\u00a0peer-reviewed\u00a0scientific press.<\/p>\n<p>Research by\u00a0Mario Beauregard\u00a0at the\u00a0University of Montreal, using\u00a0fMRI\u00a0on\u00a0Carmelite nuns, has purported to show that religious and spiritual experiences include several brain regions and not a single &#8216;God spot.&#8217; As Beauregard has said, &#8220;There is no God spot in the brain. Spiritual experiences are complex, like intense experiences with other human beings.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-27\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0The neuroimaging was conducted when the nuns were asked to\u00a0<i>recall<\/i> past mystical states, not while undergoing them; &#8220;subjects were asked to remember and relive (eyes closed) the most intense mystical experience ever felt in their lives; as a member of the Carmelite Order.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-28\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0A 2011 study by researchers at the\u00a0Duke University Medical Center\u00a0found\u00a0hippocampal\u00a0atrophy is associated with older adults who report life-changing religious experiences, as well as those who are &#8220;born-again Protestants, Catholics, and those with no religious affiliation.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-29\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>A 2016 study using fMRI found &#8220;a recognizable feeling central to &#8230; (Mormon)&#8230; devotional practice was reproducibly associated with activation in\u00a0nucleus accumbens,\u00a0ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and frontal attentional regions.\u00a0Nucleus accumbens activation preceded peak spiritual feelings by 1\u20133 s. It was replicated in four separate tasks. &#8230; The association of abstract ideas and brain reward circuitry may interact with frontal attentional and emotive salience processing, suggesting a mechanism whereby doctrinal concepts may come to be intrinsically rewarding and motivate behavior in religious individuals.&#8221;<sup id=\"cite_ref-pmid27834117_30-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<h3><span id=\"Psychopharmacology\" class=\"mw-headline\">Psychopharmacology<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Some scientists working in the field hypothesize that the basis of\u00a0<a class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Spiritual experience\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Spiritual_experience\">spiritual experience<\/a>\u00a0arises in neurological physiology. Speculative suggestions have been made that an increase of\u00a0N, N-dimethyltryptamine\u00a0levels in the\u00a0pineal gland\u00a0contribute to\u00a0spiritual experiences.<sup id=\"cite_ref-31\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><sup id=\"cite_ref-32\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0Scientific studies confirming this have yet to be published. It has also been suggested that stimulation of the temporal lobe by psychoactive ingredients of &#8216;Magic Mushrooms&#8217; mimics religious experiences.<sup id=\"cite_ref-Mushrooms_33-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup>\u00a0This\u00a0hypothesis has found laboratory validation concerning\u00a0psilocybin.<sup id=\"cite_ref-PMID_18593735_34-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><sup id=\"cite_ref-PMID_16826400_35-0\" class=\"reference\"><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>more on:<a href=\"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/\">https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>More about such a topic<\/h2>\n<div class=\"div-col\">\n<ul>\n<li>Angular gyrus \u00a7\u00a0Out-of-body experiences<\/li>\n<li>Biological psychology<\/li>\n<li>Bicameralism (psychology)<\/li>\n<li>Cognitive science of religion<\/li>\n<li>Daniel Dennett<\/li>\n<li>Dimethyltryptamine<\/li>\n<li>Dualism\/Materialism\/Nondual<\/li>\n<li>Eight-circuit model of consciousness<\/li>\n<li>Entheogen<\/li>\n<li>Eugen Drewermann<\/li>\n<li>Evolutionary origin of religions<\/li>\n<li>Geschwind syndrome<\/li>\n<li>God gene<\/li>\n<li>God helmet<\/li>\n<li><i>God in a Pill?<\/i><\/li>\n<li>Julian Jaynes<\/li>\n<li>Meditation<\/li>\n<li>Music Therapy<\/li>\n<li>Neuroethics<\/li>\n<li>Neuroscience<\/li>\n<li>Neurotechnology<\/li>\n<li>Oceanic feeling<\/li>\n<li>Philosophy of mind<\/li>\n<li>Philosophy of science<\/li>\n<li>Psychedelic crisis<\/li>\n<li>Psychology of religion<\/li>\n<li>Religious ecstasy<\/li>\n<li>Religious experience<\/li>\n<li>Temporal lobe epilepsy<\/li>\n<li>Theological anthropology<\/li>\n<li>Third Man factor<\/li>\n<li>Transpersonal psychology<\/li>\n<li>Viruses of the Mind<\/li>\n<li>VMAT2<\/li>\n<li><i>Zen and the Brain<\/i><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brain Circuit for Spirituality Identified Summary:\u00a0A new study has identified a specific brain circuit centered&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1505,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,180],"tags":[1744,1742,1743],"class_list":["post-1504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lifestyle-medicine","category-meditation","tag-experience","tag-religious","tag-spiritual"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/spirituality-brain-neuroscienceews-public.jpg?fit=770%2C513&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1504"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1504\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8628,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1504\/revisions\/8628"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.diabetesasia.org\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}